Hey Frost, I saw you're reading threads in your YT vids, so this is going to be a good one.

I used your software to record my harmony score. Using the disharmonies it gave me, I photoshopped an improved version of my face to see how I could look after plastic surgery. What's interesting is I was able to acheive near perfect harmony in my edit. The front profile has a harmony score of 9.19. This is higher than even Matt Bomer or Jon Erik Hexum. However, I don't think my edited face looks more attractive than them. In fact, I don't think it looks better than someone like Chico or Alain Delon, who according to your software have a much lower harmony score.

This is making me realize the limmitation of the harmony score. If it's truely an objective system, then a higher score should always make a more attractive face, but it doesn't. Even in the celebrity analysis page, I don't agree with the relative rankings. How can someone like Doutzen Kroes have a higher harmony score than Brooke Sheilds? And also, why is Josh Mcgregor rated an 8.0 harmony? His face is extremely asymetrical, and his appeal is very low.

Even the "mathmatically perfect face" only has a frontal harmony of about 7.0 and a side harmony of 5.5. There clearly has to be something wrong here.

Are you certain that your harmony weights and ranges are truely ideal? And if you beleive they are, I challenge you to create a mathmatically perfect face. Use photoshop and make a face with a 100% harmony score. I want to see what that would look like, and if it stacks up to objectively attractive faces in real life.