I used chatgpt to analise my face in combination with the free features of faceiqlabs.

Im realy curious if he did a good job, so could one of you guys rate my face with the paid version. If it is lower then chatgpts rating, we know that chatgpt is a glazer and doesnt want to hurt peoples feelings. If it is spot on, faceiqlabs might have competiton from a free tool.

Chatgpt also gave some specific details about what was good and bad(like good jaw bone structure, good facial thirds, bad eyebrow lowsettedness), I would like some feedback of you guys about that please.

After explicitly saying I wanted a rating based on the faceiqlabs scale, He gave pretty good results:

side profile(already provided by faceiqlabs): 6.53

front profile(made up by chatgpt): 6.5

this is the full response of chatgpt(there is no extra info below it):

###########################################

You’re right—those are the more canonical 4 pillars used by FaceIQ Labs in their stricter breakdown:

Harmony, Dimorphism, Angularity, Features

Let’s recalibrate your analysis properly using your ratios + both images.

1. Harmony → ~6.6 – 6.9 / 10

This pillar is heavily driven by your facial thirds + width/height, which are excellent:

Near-perfect thirds (≈10/10 across)
Strong width-to-height (9.26)
Good overall alignment (nose–lips–chin)

Why not 8+?

Eye region doesn’t perfectly integrate with the rest (brow position affects this)
Slight convexity in profile

Verdict:
High-level structure, but not “mathematically flawless harmony” → still clearly above average

2. Dimorphism (masculinity markers) → ~6.3 – 6.7 / 10

This measures traits like:

Jaw robustness
Brow prominence
Facial width
Feature boldness

Positives:

Good facial width ratio (9.26)
Decent jaw structure

Limiters:

Brow is not very low-set (5.93 → big factor here)
Jaw/chin not extremely pronounced
Overall look is more “balanced” than strongly masculine

Verdict:
Moderately masculine, not highly dimorphic → caps this pillar

3. Angularity → ~6.2 – 6.6 / 10

This is about:

Jaw sharpness
Cheekbone definition
Overall bone “edges”

Positives:

Clean jawline
Good neck–jaw separation

Limiters:

Not highly angular (softer transitions)
Cheekbones not very prominent from front view
Gonial angle not extremely sharp

Verdict:
Clear structure, but lacks the sharpness these systems reward heavily

4. Features → ~6.1 – 6.5 / 10

This is where your score is most constrained.

Driven by:

Eyebrow low-setness: 5.93 (primary limiter)
Eye shape/tilt (neutral, not highly optimized)
Lips slightly thinner than ideal
Nose is good but not standout

Important:
Even though nothing is “bad,” FaceIQ rewards exceptional features, not just good ones.

Verdict:
Consistently decent features, but no standout → pulls score down

Final Pillar Summary

PillarScoreImpactHarmony~6.7Strongest pillarDimorphism~6.5Mild limiterAngularity~6.4Mild limiterFeatures~6.3Main limiter

Why You Land at ~6.5

Your profile is:

Structurally very strong (hidden in harmony)
But lacks extreme traits in the other 3 pillars

FaceIQ logic favors:

“Distinctive, extreme traits > balanced consistency”

So even though:

You have no real weaknesses
You have elite proportions

You still get:
→ ~6.5 (≈70–75th percentile)

Most Important Insight

If one thing changed:

Eyebrow low-setness (5.93 → ~7.5)

You’d likely see:

Features ↑
Dimorphism ↑
Harmony slightly ↑

→ Overall score could move into ~6.9–7.2 range

If you want, I can simulate a “maximized version” of your face within your structure to show the theoretical ceiling on this scale.

###########################################