FaceIQ LabsFaceIQ Labs
Save
Overview
Analysis
Harmony
7.06/10

Great harmony

Top 4.8%› 1 in 20.8
Angularity
4.82/10

Average angularity

Bottom 48%› 1 in 2.07
Dimorphism
5.33/10

Slightly above average dimorphism

Top 47%› 1 in 2.13
Features
6.06/10

Average features

Top 27%› 1 in 3.77
Combined into Overall Score
Overall Score
4 of 4 pillars
5.76/10

Your complete attractiveness score

Key Strengths
ideal
10.0
Ideal jaw width

Ideal jaw width

This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Contributing Ratios1
Bigonial width
10.0
ideal
10.0
Ideal ramus length

Ideal ramus length

This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.

Contributing Ratios2
Ramus to Mandible Ratio
10.0
Gonion to mouth line
10.0
ideal
10.0
Ideal mouth width

Ideal mouth width

This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.

Contributing Ratios2
Mouth width to nose width ratio
10.0
Interpupillary-Mouth Width Ratio
10.0
Areas of Improvement
severe
-0.82
Long midface

Long midface

Impact-0.82pts
Rolling-0.82pts

The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.

This disrupts facial harmony by overemphasizing the middle of the face.

Affected Ratios4
Face Width to Height Ratio
3.3
Middle Third
8.0
Midface Ratio
7.9
Ipsilateral Alar Angle
2.7
severe
-0.82
Long nose

Long nose

Impact-0.82pts
Rolling-0.00pts

The nose is too long vertically, unbalancing the midface proportions.

This disrupts facial harmony by elongating the midface and drawing attention to the nose.

Affected Ratios4
Middle Third
8.0
Midface Ratio
7.9
Ipsilateral Alar Angle
2.7
Face Width to Height Ratio
3.3
severe
-0.55
Close-set eyes

Close-set eyes

Impact-0.55pts
Rolling-0.55pts

The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.

This disrupts facial harmony by making the eye area appear too compressed.

Affected Ratios1
Eye Separation Ratio
4.9
5.76 · Average — FaceIQ Labs