FaceIQ LabsFaceIQ Labs
Overview
Analysis
Harmony
3.15/10

Poor harmony

Bottom 7.5%› 1 in 13.3
Angularity
5.68/10

Good angularity

Top 41%› 1 in 2.41
Dimorphism
6.25/10

Very good dimorphism

Top 21%› 1 in 4.77
Features
6.04/10

Average features

Top 27%› 1 in 3.68
Combined into Overall Score
Overall Score
4 of 4 pillars
5.11/10

Your complete attractiveness score

Key Strengths
ideal
10.0
Ideal forehead width

Ideal forehead width

This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Contributing Ratios1
Bitemporal Width
10.0
ideal
10.0
Ideal jaw length

Ideal jaw length

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.

Contributing Ratios3
Lower Third Proportion
10.0
Chin to philtrum ratio
10.0
Midface Ratio
10.0
ideal
10.0
Ideal interior midface width

Ideal interior midface width

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.

Contributing Ratios2
Ipsilateral Alar Angle
10.0
Midface Ratio
10.0
Areas of Improvement
extreme
-1.39
Long midface

Long midface

Impact-1.39pts
Rolling-0.62pts

The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.

This disrupts facial harmony by overemphasizing the middle of the face.

Affected Ratios1
Face Width to Height Ratio
0.7
extreme
-1.20
Insufficient eye tilt

Insufficient eye tilt

Impact-1.20pts
Rolling-0.73pts

The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.

This disrupts facial harmony by creating a less alert and youthful appearance.

Affected Ratios1
Lateral Canthal Tilt
2.0
extreme
-1.00
Overly long face shape

Overly long face shape

Impact-1.00pts
Rolling-0.62pts

The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.

This disrupts facial harmony by creating a vertically stretched appearance to the face.

Affected Ratios1
Total Facial Width to Height Ratio
2.0
5.11 · Average — FaceIQ Labs