FaceIQ LabsFaceIQ Labs
Save
Overview
Analysis
Harmony
6.15/10

Very good harmony

Top 24%› 1 in 4.21
Angularity
4.54/10

Slightly below average angularity

Bottom 46%› 1 in 2.18
Dimorphism
4.33/10

Below average dimorphism

Bottom 39%› 1 in 2.58
Features
5.01/10

Fair features

Top 50%› 1 in 2.00
Combined into Overall Score
Overall Score
4 of 4 pillars
4.96/10

Your complete attractiveness score

Key Strengths
ideal
10.0
Ideal jaw width

Ideal jaw width

This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Contributing Ratios1
Bigonial width
10.0
ideal
10.0
Balanced nose length

Balanced nose length

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.

Contributing Ratios4
Midface Ratio
10.0
Ipsilateral Alar Angle
10.0
Middle Third
10.0
Nasal W to H ratio
10.0
ideal
10.0
Ideal interior midface width

Ideal interior midface width

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.

Contributing Ratios2
Ipsilateral Alar Angle
10.0
Midface Ratio
10.0
Areas of Improvement
moderate
-0.43
Round neck region

Round neck region

Impact-0.43pts
Rolling-0.43pts

The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.

This disrupts facial harmony by reducing neck definition.

Affected Ratios1
Submental Cervical Angle
0.7
moderate
-0.36
Thin neck

Thin neck

Impact-0.36pts
Rolling-0.36pts

The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.

This disrupts facial harmony by underemphasizing the neck and creating a weak and delicate appearance.

Affected Ratios1
Neck Width
2.3
moderate
-0.32
Overly compact face shape

Overly compact face shape

Impact-0.32pts
Rolling-0.32pts

The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.

This disrupts facial harmony by creating an overly compressed and wide appearance to the face.

Affected Ratios1
Total Facial Width to Height Ratio
5.8
4.96 · Developing — FaceIQ Labs