Loading Harmony
Harmony
Erik King
Harmony
4.3
Below average harmony
Bottom 37%Side profile
Summary
Erik King's Harmony score is 4.3, 811th of 902 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Face Width to Height Ratio at 0.5 and Lower Third Proportion at 0.0. Lacy (4.3), Drake (4.3) and Elvis Presley (4.3) come closest to Erik's Harmony score. David Rosenberg (Model) has the highest, at 8.9.
Strengths
- Ideal jaw width
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0 - Ideal forehead width
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0 - Ideal forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0 - Ideal eye spacing
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
10.0 - Ideal eye size
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
10.0 - Balanced eye shape
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0 - Ideal neck width
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0 - Defined neck contour
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
10.0 - Ideal midface projection
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
10.0 - Ideal cupid's bow depth
This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0 - Refined nasal tip
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.8 - Well-contoured orbital region
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.6 - Harmonious ear protrusion
This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.5 - Balanced brow ridge
This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
8.9 - Good nose bridge width
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
8.6 - Additional Strengths
11 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.7
Areas for improvement
- Long midface
The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
8.8% - Weak/soft jaw structure
The jaw has a softer, rounder shape, often less angular and robust than the ideal.
7.7% - Hyper-divergent jaw growth
The jaw grows with an overly steep angle, resulting in a long or narrow lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an open bite or underbite.
7.2% - Long upper jaw
The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
6.9% - Mandibular recession
The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
6.5% - Underprojected chin
The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
6.5% - Overly long face shape
The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
6.3% - Disproportionate lower face (short chin or long philtrum)
The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
6.3% - Short lower jaw
The lower jaw is too short, reducing lower face strength and balance.
6.3% - Steep jaw
The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
4.9% - Narrow mouth
The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
3.1% - Medium-set eyebrows
The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
2.4% - Wide nose
The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.4% - Medium-set cheekbones
The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
2.2% - Rounder convex facial profile
The face appears overly rounded, often due to excessive forward projection of the upper, middle, or lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an overbite or overjet.
2.1% - Insufficient eye tilt
The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
1.9% - Long top third
The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
1.9% - Overly full lower lip
The lower lip is excessively thick, creating disproportionate lip proportions.
1.7% - Overly protruded lower lip
The lower lip juts out excessively, unbalancing the lower face.
1.5% - Disharmonious midface and jaw alignment
The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.4% - Lacking eyebrow length
The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.4% - Overly sloped upper forehead
The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
1.3% - Flat eyebrows
The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
0.4% - Minor Proportional Variations
5 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
2.5%
Share
Questions
What is Erik King's Harmony score?
Erik King's Harmony score is 4.3 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
How does Erik King's Harmony compare with other celebrities?
By Harmony score, Erik King is ranked 811th of 902 men on the wiki.