Naomi Osaka front
Face Width to Height Ratio0.8
Naomi Osaka side
Browridge Inclination Angle1.3

Naomi Osaka

Facial Harmony Analysis

Overall
3.6
Bottom 18%·Below average harmony
Front
3.0
Bottom 4.9%
Side
4.7
Bottom 47%

Ratio Breakdown

Side Profile

Strengths

10.0
Ideal jaw width
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0
Ideal nose bridge width
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0
Well-positioned lower lip
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0
Ideal cupid's bow depth
This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0
Harmonious face shape
This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
9.9
Excellent maxillary projection
This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.9
Well-positioned upper lip
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9
Harmonious facial convexity
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.9
Well-projected nose
This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.8
Balanced lower lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8
Balanced nasal profile
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.8
Balanced upper lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8
Refined nasal tip
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.7
Harmonious ear protrusion
This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.7
Balanced brow ridge
This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.6
Excellent upper forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
9.5
Excellent forehead width
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.5
Excellent interior midface width
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
8.9
Balanced eye shape
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
8.9
Harmonious midface and jaw alignment
This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
8.8
Good eyebrow length
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.9
Additional Strengths
7 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.

Areas for Improvement

10.1%
Long midface
The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
7.6%
Insufficient eye tilt
The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
5.6%
Hyper-divergent jaw growth
The jaw grows with an overly steep angle, resulting in a long or narrow lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an open bite or underbite.
5.1%
Disproportionate lower face (long chin or short philtrum)
The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
5.1%
Short upper jaw
The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
5.0%
Steep jaw
The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
4.1%
Low-set cheekbones
The cheekbones are positioned too low, reducing midface prominence and youthfulness.
3.4%
Underprojected midface
The midface is underprojected.
3.3%
High-set eyebrows
The eyebrows are positioned too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
3.0%
Round neck region
The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.7%
Overly harsh and prominent jaw
The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
2.7%
Elongated lower jaw
The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
2.7%
Long lower third
The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.7%
Close-set eyes
The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
2.6%
Short top third
The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
2.3%
Wide nose
The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.3%
Narrow mouth
The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.0%
Maxillary recession
The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
1.6%
Long middle third
The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
1.5%
Flat eyebrows
The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
1.5%
Mandibular recession
The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
1.5%
Underprojected chin
The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
1.4%
Overly wide neck
The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
1.3%
Overly sloped forehead appearance
The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
0.7%
Downturned mouth
The mouth corners are downturned, creating a frowning or sad appearance.
0.4%
Sunken orbital region
The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
3.3%
Minor Proportional Variations
5 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.