Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


4.2
Below average harmony
Bottom 33%Naomi Osaka's Harmony score is 4.2, 594th of 613 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of her breakdown are Bitemporal Width and Ear Protrusion Angle, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Browridge Inclination Angle at 1.1 and Face Width to Height Ratio at 0.9. Among the other celebrities, Contrapoints (4.2), Snooki (4.1) and Giorgia Cardinaletti (4.0) sit closest. The highest on the wiki is Sara Sampaio, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.08 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
8.4%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
7.0%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
3.8%The cheekbones are positioned too low, reducing midface prominence and youthfulness.
3.7%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
3.3%The eyebrows are positioned too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
3.0%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.7%The midface is underprojected.
2.5%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.5%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.5%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
2.5%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
2.5%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.5%The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
2.2%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
2.0%The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
1.9%The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
1.5%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.4%The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
1.2%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
1.0%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.0%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.6%The mouth corners are downturned, creating a frowning or sad appearance.
0.5%6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.0%Naomi Osaka's Harmony score is 4.2 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Naomi Osaka is ranked 594th of 613 women on the wiki.