Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.6
Excellent harmony
Top 1.4%FaceIQ Labs rates Lauren De Graaf's Harmony at 7.6, 210th of 625 women on the wiki, in the top 34%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Bitemporal Width and Brow Length to Face Width Ratio, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Nasal W to H ratio at 1.8 and Lower Third Proportion at 1.3. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Sun Hi Lee (7.6), Haley Kalil (7.5) and Keira Knightley (7.5). Sara Sampaio has the highest, at 9.2.
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious face shape; the top, middle, and Lower Thirds are neither too short nor too long.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.4This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
8.8This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
8.8This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
8.69 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
10.0The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
3.9%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
3.7%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.0%The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
2.7%The lower jaw is too short, reducing lower face strength and balance.
2.7%The face appears overly rounded, often due to excessive forward projection of the upper, middle, or lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an overbite or overjet.
2.6%The nose protrudes excessively, dominating the facial profile.
1.9%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
1.6%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
0.9%The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
0.8%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.5%8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
4.8%Lauren De Graaf's Harmony score is 7.6 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Lauren De Graaf is ranked 210th of 625 women on the wiki, in the top 34%.