Janhvi Kapoor front
Chin to philtrum ratio0.5
Janhvi Kapoor side
Recession relative to frankfort plane1.6

Janhvi Kapoor

Facial Harmony Analysis

Overall
5.4
Top 46%·Good harmony
Front
4.8
Bottom 48%
Side
6.3
Top 19%

Ratio Breakdown

Side Profile

Strengths

10.0
Ideal cupid's bow depth
This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0
Harmonious ear protrusion
This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
10.0
Balanced brow ridge
This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0
Ideal eyebrow length
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0
Ideal neck width
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0
Balanced eyebrow tilt
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.9
Well-positioned lower lip
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9
Balanced lower lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9
Well-projected nose
This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.9
Excellent maxillary projection
This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.9
Harmonious facial convexity
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.9
Excellent forehead width
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9
Balanced nasal profile
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.8
Excellent interior midface width
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.8
Balanced nose length
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.7
Well-positioned upper lip
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.7
Balanced upper lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.5
Excellent nose bridge width
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.4
Excellent ramus length
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.1
Well-positioned eyebrows
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.1
Good jaw width
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.6
Additional Strengths
7 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.

Areas for Improvement

5.1%
Long midface
The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
4.8%
Short upper jaw
The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
4.5%
Overly long face shape
The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
3.9%
Mandibular recession
The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.9%
Underprojected chin
The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
3.6%
Overly harsh and prominent jaw
The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
3.6%
Disproportionate lower face (long chin or short philtrum)
The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
3.6%
Elongated lower jaw
The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
3.6%
Flat jaw
The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
3.1%
Insufficient eye tilt
The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
2.6%
Disharmonious midface and jaw alignment
The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.6%
Underprojected midface
The midface is underprojected.
1.9%
Medium-set cheekbones
The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.8%
Overly round eye shape
The eyes appear excessively round.
1.2%
Long lower third
The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
1.1%
Round neck region
The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
0.9%
Overly flat forehead appearance
The forehead is too flat, lacking natural curvature and prominence.
0.5%
Overly sloped upper forehead
The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.5%
Sunken orbital region
The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
0.3%
Overly sharp and pointed nasal tip
The nose tip is excessively pointed, creating a harsh appearance.
5.8%
Minor Proportional Variations
9 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.