Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


4.8
Average harmony
Bottom 48%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Daniel Dae Kim scores 4.8, 760th of 899 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Anterior Facial Depth and Facial Convexity (Glabella), both at 10.0; at the bottom, Nasofacial Angle at 1.6 and Deviation of IAA(Ipsilateral alar angle) & JFA(Jaw frontal angle) at 0.3. Among the other celebrities, Sivakarthikeyan (4.8), Hasan Piker (4.8) and Jonathan Majors (4.8) sit closest. The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
8.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
8.7This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
8.512 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
6.7%The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
5.6%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
4.6%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
4.6%The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
4.3%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
3.4%The eyebrows are positioned too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
3.2%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
3.0%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
3.0%The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
2.5%The forehead has a softer, less prominent ridge than the ideal.
2.3%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
2.2%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
2.2%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
2.1%The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
1.7%The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
1.5%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.5%The forehead is too slim relative to the face, reducing upper face balance.
1.4%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
1.2%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.2%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
1.1%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
0.9%The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
0.5%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.3%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.2%4 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
3.1%Daniel Dae Kim's Harmony score is 4.8 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Daniel Dae Kim is ranked 760th of 899 men on the wiki.