Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


3.3
Poor harmony
Bottom 9.8%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, KL Rahul scores 3.3, 872nd of 910 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Bitemporal Width and Browridge Inclination Angle, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Ear Protrusion Angle at 0.5 and Gonial Angle at 0.4. FootboxG (Beatbox) (3.3), Max Verstappen (3.3) and Matt Gaetz (3.2) come closest to KL's Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.2This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.2This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
8.8This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
8.87 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
8.7%The jaw grows with an overly steep angle, resulting in a long or narrow lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an open bite or underbite.
6.7%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
6.5%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
5.3%The eyes are too far apart, creating a wide or stretched midface appearance.
4.8%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
4.1%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
3.8%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
3.7%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.7%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
3.7%The midface is underprojected.
3.6%The cheekbones are positioned too low, reducing midface prominence and youthfulness.
3.6%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
3.5%The middle of the face is too short, appearing compressed or wide.
2.6%The central midface is too wide, often due to wide-set eyes or a short nose.
2.6%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
2.5%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
2.5%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
2.5%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.5%The nose is too short vertically, creating a less balanced midface.
2.4%The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
2.3%The eyes appear excessively round.
1.6%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
1.5%The upper lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the lower lip.
1.5%The lower lip is too recessed, reducing fullness and profile balance.
1.4%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.1%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
1.1%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
0.7%The mouth corners are downturned, creating a frowning or sad appearance.
0.5%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.2%6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
7.6%KL Rahul's Harmony score is 3.3 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, KL Rahul is ranked 872nd of 910 men on the wiki.