Loading Harmony
Harmony
FootboxG (Beatbox)
Harmony
2.4
Poor harmony
Bottom 1.4%Side profile
Summary
FaceIQ Labs rates FootboxG (Beatbox)'s Harmony at 2.4, 863rd of 874 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Ear Protrusion Angle and Ear Protrusion Ratio, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Nose Bridge to Nose Width and One Eye Apart Test, both at 0.0. Ruben Slikk (2.4), Jeff bezos (2.5) and Noah Wyle (2.5) come closest to FootboxG's Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
Strengths
- Harmonious ear protrusion
This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
10.0 - Well-contoured orbital region
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0 - Balanced facial thirds
This contributes to a harmonious face shape; the top, middle, and Lower Thirds are neither too short nor too long.
10.0 - Excellent ramus length
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.9 - Refined nasal tip
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.7 - Excellent jaw length
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.7 - Balanced jaw shape
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.7 - Balanced lower lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.5 - Well-positioned cheekbones
This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
9.3 - Good midface projection
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.3 - Additional Strengths
8 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.7
Areas for improvement
- Close-set eyes
The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
8.6% - Insufficient eye tilt
The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
6.4% - Wide nose
The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
6.2% - Narrow jaw
The jaw is too slim, creating a delicate or less robust lower face appearance.
4.6% - Weak/soft jaw structure
The jaw has a softer, rounder shape, often less angular and robust than the ideal.
4.6% - Narrow mouth
The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
4.6% - Overly narrow and compact eye shape
The eyes are too slim and elongated, creating a squinted appearance.
4.6% - Overly wide neck
The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
4.6% - Overly wide eyes
The eyes are too wide, creating a less balanced facial appearance.
3.9% - Overly compact face shape
The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
3.7% - Medium-set eyebrows
The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
3.3% - Flat jaw
The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
3.1% - Overprojected nose
The nose protrudes excessively, dominating the facial profile.
2.9% - Disproportionate lower face (short chin or long philtrum)
The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.6% - Long upper jaw
The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
2.6% - Short lower jaw
The lower jaw is too short, reducing lower face strength and balance.
2.6% - Round neck region
The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.5% - Disharmonious midface and jaw alignment
The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.3% - Lacking eyebrow length
The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.8% - Overly wide nose bridge
The nose bridge is excessively wide.
1.5% - Overly sloped forehead appearance
The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.4% - Overly sharp and pointed nasal tip
The nose tip is excessively pointed, creating a harsh appearance.
1.4% - Narrow forehead
The forehead is too slim relative to the face, reducing upper face balance.
1.3% - Overly retruded upper lip
The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
1.2% - Flat eyebrows
The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
1.2% - Overly sloped upper forehead
The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.7% - Thin upper lip
The upper lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the lower lip.
0.6% - Long midface
The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
0.6% - Lacking cupid's bow
The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.6% - Minor Proportional Variations
7 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.0%
Similar harmony6
Share
Questions
What is FootboxG (Beatbox)'s Harmony score?
FootboxG (Beatbox)'s Harmony score is 2.4 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
How does FootboxG (Beatbox)'s Harmony compare with other celebrities?
By Harmony score, FootboxG (Beatbox) is ranked 863rd of 874 men on the wiki.