Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


2.5
Poor harmony
Bottom 1.6%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Mitten Squad scores 2.5, 755th of 766 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Top Third at 0.4 and Submental Cervical Angle at 0.1. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Jeff bezos (2.5), Noah Wyle (2.5) and Ruben Slikk (2.4). The highest on the wiki is Alain Delon(prime), at 9.0.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
8.89 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8The eyes are too far apart, creating a wide or stretched midface appearance.
10.4%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
10.2%The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
8.2%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
8.2%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
5.9%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
5.2%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
5.2%The nose lacks forward projection, appearing flat and less defined in the profile.
5.0%The nose appears too soft and weak, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
4.6%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
4.6%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
4.5%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
4.4%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
4.0%The nose is too short vertically, creating a less balanced midface.
3.0%The central midface is too wide, often due to wide-set eyes or a short nose.
3.0%The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
3.0%The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
2.8%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
2.5%The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
2.5%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
2.3%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.3%The lower lip is too recessed, reducing fullness and profile balance.
2.3%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
2.2%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.8%The eyes appear excessively round.
1.7%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.5%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.1%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
1.1%14 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
10.5%Mitten Squad's Harmony score is 2.5 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Mitten Squad is ranked 755th of 766 men on the wiki.