Loading Harmony
Harmony
Daniel Larson
Harmony
2.0
Poor harmony
Bottom 0.4%Side profile
Summary
FaceIQ Labs rates Daniel Larson's Harmony at 2.0, 900th of 904 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Gonion to mouth line and Lower Third, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Middle Third and Upper Lip E-Line Position, both at 0.0. Chad Michael Murray (2.2), Julian Richings (2.2) and Freddie Gibbs (2.2) come closest to Daniel's Harmony score. David Rosenberg (Model) has the highest, at 8.9.
Strengths
- Ideal ramus length
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0 - Ideal upper forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0 - Harmonious facial convexity
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.8 - Excellent maxillary projection
This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.7 - Well-contoured orbital region
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.5 - Excellent midface projection
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.5 - Excellent nose bridge width
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.4 - Good eye tilt
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.2 - Additional Strengths
11 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6
Areas for improvement
- Long midface
The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
11.5% - Hypo-divergent jaw growth
The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
8.7% - Flat jaw
The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
8.1% - Disproportionate lower face (long chin or short philtrum)
The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
6.8% - Short upper jaw
The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
6.8% - Elongated lower jaw
The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
6.8% - Overly harsh and prominent jaw
The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
6.2% - Overly compact face shape
The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
5.3% - Close-set eyes
The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
3.7% - High-set eyebrows
The eyebrows are positioned too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
3.6% - Low-set cheekbones
The cheekbones are positioned too low, reducing midface prominence and youthfulness.
3.6% - Long nose
The nose is too long vertically, unbalancing the midface proportions.
3.1% - Disharmonious midface and jaw alignment
The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
3.1% - Long middle third
The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
3.1% - Overly retruded lower lip
The lower lip is too recessed, reducing fullness and profile balance.
2.9% - Thin lower lip
The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
2.9% - Short top third
The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
2.8% - Soft and weak brow ridge
The forehead has a softer, less prominent ridge than the ideal.
2.6% - Lacking eyebrow length
The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
2.3% - Overly retruded upper lip
The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
2.2% - Thin upper lip
The upper lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the lower lip.
2.2% - Overly round eye shape
The eyes appear excessively round.
2.0% - Protruded ears
The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
1.9% - Downturned eyebrows
The eyebrows slope downward, giving a tired or stern appearance.
1.7% - Narrow forehead
The forehead is too slim relative to the face, reducing upper face balance.
1.6% - Rounder convex facial profile
The face appears overly rounded, often due to excessive forward projection of the upper, middle, or lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an overbite or overjet.
1.6% - Overly wide or bloated jaw
The jaw appears excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
1.3% - Round neck region
The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
1.3% - Overly sloped forehead appearance
The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.0% - Downturned mouth
The mouth corners are downturned, creating a frowning or sad appearance.
0.9% - Thin neck
The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
0.8% - Overly rounded and undefined nasal tip
The nose tip is too round, lacking sharpness and definition.
0.7% - Lacking cupid's bow
The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.3% - Minor Proportional Variations
9 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
8.8%
Similar harmony6
Share
Questions
What is Daniel Larson's Harmony score?
Daniel Larson's Harmony score is 2.0 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
How does Daniel Larson's Harmony compare with other celebrities?
By Harmony score, Daniel Larson is ranked 900th of 904 men on the wiki.