Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


8.1
Exceptional harmony
Top 0.3%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Erik Harding scores 8.1, 77th of 902 men on the wiki, in the top 9%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Lower Lip Burstone Line at 2.4 and Nasal W to H ratio at 1.5. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Filip Wolfe (8.1), Freddie Ljungberg (8.1) and Mark Frechette (8.1). David Rosenberg (Model) has the highest, at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the chin sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour in both the front and side profiles.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
8.71 ratio showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
10.0The nose protrudes excessively, dominating the facial profile.
2.7%The lower lip juts out excessively, unbalancing the lower face.
2.0%The lower lip is excessively thick, creating disproportionate lip proportions.
2.0%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
1.5%The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
1.1%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.7%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
0.6%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.6%The nose tip is excessively pointed, creating a harsh appearance.
0.5%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
0.5%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.2%5 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
4.4%Erik Harding's Harmony score is 8.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Erik Harding is ranked 77th of 902 men on the wiki, in the top 9%.