Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.7
Exceptional harmony
Top 1.1%Simon Nessman's Harmony score is 7.7, 162nd of 910 men on the wiki, in the top 18%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Submental Cervical Angle at 2.1 and Chin to philtrum ratio at 1.8. Among the other celebrities, Brad Pitt (7.7), Jerome Adamoli (7.7) and Vasiliy Stepanov (teen) (7.7) sit closest. The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the chin sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.7This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.3This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
8.51 ratio showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
10.0The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
5.1%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
5.1%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
3.6%The cheekbones are positioned too low, reducing midface prominence and youthfulness.
3.5%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
3.2%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
3.2%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
2.6%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.1%The forehead is too flat, lacking natural curvature and prominence.
0.7%The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
0.5%6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
1.8%Simon Nessman's Harmony score is 7.7 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Simon Nessman is ranked 162nd of 910 men on the wiki, in the top 18%.