Loading Harmony
Harmony
Cynthia Erivo
Harmony
3.9
Below average harmony
Bottom 24%Side profile
Summary
FaceIQ Labs rates Cynthia Erivo's Harmony at 3.9, 450th of 457 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of her breakdown are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Face Width to Height Ratio at 0.3 and Browridge Inclination Angle at 0.0. Anna Nicole Smith (3.9), Rossy De Palma (3.9) and Zena (Zenawuf) (3.9) come closest to Cynthia's Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is Sharam Diniz, at 9.2.
Strengths
- Ideal jaw width
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0 - Harmonious midface and jaw alignment
This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0 - Ideal forehead width
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0 - Balanced brow ridge
This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0 - Well-contoured orbital region
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0 - Defined neck contour
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
10.0 - Excellent neck width
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.9 - Well-projected nose
This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.7 - Balanced nasal profile
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.6 - Excellent midface projection
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.5 - Excellent maxillary projection
This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.4 - Well-projected chin
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the chin sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.4 - Balanced upper lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.4 - Well-positioned upper lip
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.4 - Harmonious facial convexity
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.1 - Good eye tilt
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.0 - Well-positioned cheekbones
This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
8.9 - Good upper forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
8.6 - Additional Strengths
7 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.7
Areas for improvement
- Long midface
The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
12.8% - Close-set eyes
The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
9.4% - Long upper jaw
The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
6.4% - Weak/soft jaw structure
The jaw has a softer, rounder shape, often less angular and robust than the ideal.
5.1% - Disproportionate lower face (short chin or long philtrum)
The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
4.9% - Wide nose
The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
4.1% - Long nose
The nose is too long vertically, unbalancing the midface proportions.
3.8% - Droopy nose
The nose droops downward, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
3.4% - High-set eyebrows
The eyebrows are positioned too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
3.1% - Narrow mouth
The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.8% - Short lower jaw
The lower jaw is too short, reducing lower face strength and balance.
2.7% - Long middle third
The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
2.3% - Steep jaw
The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
2.2% - Overly long face shape
The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
1.9% - Flat eyebrows
The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
1.6% - Overly sloped forehead appearance
The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.5% - Overly rounded and undefined nasal tip
The nose tip is too round, lacking sharpness and definition.
1.3% - Overly round eye shape
The eyes appear excessively round.
1.0% - Lacking eyebrow length
The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.7% - Short top third
The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
0.7% - Overly narrow nose bridge
The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.5% - Lacking cupid's bow
The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.3% - Minor Proportional Variations
8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
6.9%
Similar harmony6
Share
Questions
What is Cynthia Erivo's Harmony score?
Cynthia Erivo's Harmony score is 3.9 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
How does Cynthia Erivo's Harmony compare with other celebrities?
By Harmony score, Cynthia Erivo is ranked 450th of 457 women on the wiki.