Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


8.0
Exceptional harmony
Top 0.4%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Elsa Hosk scores 8.0, 115th of 625 women on the wiki, in the top 19%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Nose Bridge to Nose Width at 3.5 and Deviation of IAA(Ipsilateral alar angle) & JFA(Jaw frontal angle) at 2.8. Camilla Cabello (8.0), Joanna Pacula (8.0) and Senait Gidey (8.0) come closest to Elsa's Harmony score. Sara Sampaio has the highest, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating that the lower jaw is not recessed or overly projected.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the chin sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.1This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
8.8This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
8.84 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
4.8%The outer corners of the eyes tilt upward excessively, creating an exaggerated look.
2.5%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.2%The nose bridge is excessively wide.
1.0%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
0.7%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.7%The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
0.5%The eyebrows arch too high, creating an overly expressive or surprised look.
0.5%The nose tip is excessively pointed, creating a harsh appearance.
0.4%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.1%5 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
3.4%Elsa Hosk's Harmony score is 8.0 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Elsa Hosk is ranked 115th of 625 women on the wiki, in the top 19%.