Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


3.7
Below average harmony
Bottom 20%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Erika Kirk (prime) scores 3.7, 562nd of 573 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of her breakdown are Bitemporal Width and Browridge Inclination Angle, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Nasofacial Angle and Nasomental Angle, both at 0.0. Elizabeth Moss (3.8), Evangelina (Evangelinaglow) (3.7) and Zena (Zenawuf) (3.9) come closest to Erika's Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is Sharam Diniz, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.6This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.212 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
14.0%The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
14.0%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
10.2%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
8.4%The nose appears too soft and weak, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
7.8%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
7.4%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
6.9%The upper lip is excessively thick, creating disproportionate lip proportions.
6.1%The upper lip extends too far forward, disrupting facial harmony.
5.9%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
5.8%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
4.2%The nose droops downward, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
4.0%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
3.7%The lower lip juts out excessively, unbalancing the lower face.
3.0%The lower lip is excessively thick, creating disproportionate lip proportions.
3.0%The jaw appears excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
2.9%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
2.3%The middle of the face is too short, appearing compressed or wide.
2.2%The nose is too short vertically, creating a less balanced midface.
2.2%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.1%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
2.1%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.7%The nose tip is excessively pointed, creating a harsh appearance.
1.4%The mouth is excessively wide, creating an unbalanced oral region.
1.2%The eyebrows arch too high, creating an overly expressive or surprised look.
0.9%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
0.7%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
0.5%6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
7.6%Erika Kirk (prime)'s Harmony score is 3.7 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Erika Kirk (prime) is ranked 562nd of 573 women on the wiki.