Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


6.3
Very good harmony
Top 20%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Hamza scores 6.3, 520th of 905 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Anterior Facial Depth and Bigonial width, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Face Width to Height Ratio at 1.3 and Mouth width to nose width ratio at 0.9. Billy Herrington (6.3), Brandon Green (MK11 Geras) (6.3) and Steve Jobs (6.3) come closest to Hamza's Harmony score. David Rosenberg (Model) has the highest, at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.7This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious face shape; the top, middle, and Lower Thirds are neither too short nor too long.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
8.7This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
8.68 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.9The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
8.0%The eyes are too far apart, creating a wide or stretched midface appearance.
5.6%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
5.0%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
3.5%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.8%The eyes appear excessively round.
2.4%The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
1.3%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.8%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
0.6%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
0.6%10 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.6%Hamza's Harmony score is 6.3 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Hamza is ranked 520th of 905 men on the wiki.