Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


6.3
Very good harmony
Top 20%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Hunter Schafer scores 6.3, 462nd of 614 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Total Facial Convexity at 2.3 and Recession relative to frankfort plane at 0.8. Liv Tyler (6.3), Melodie Monrose (6.3) and Maria Prisyazhnuk (6.3) come closest to Hunter's Harmony score. Sara Sampaio has the highest, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.6This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
8.7This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
8.57 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
10.0The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
14.8%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
14.1%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
5.7%The face appears overly rounded, often due to excessive forward projection of the upper, middle, or lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an overbite or overjet.
5.3%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.9%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.1%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
1.1%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
0.8%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
0.7%8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
6.3%Hunter Schafer's Harmony score is 6.3 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Hunter Schafer is ranked 462nd of 614 women on the wiki.