Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.0
Great harmony
Top 6%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Jasmine Sanders scores 7.0, 362nd of 659 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of her breakdown are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Mouth width to nose width ratio at 1.0 and Lower Third Proportion at 0.8. Alyssa Sutherland (7.0), Riley Reid (7.0) and Vita Sidorkina (7.0) come closest to Jasmine's Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is Sara Sampaio, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious face shape; the top, middle, and Lower Thirds are neither too short nor too long.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.6This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.211 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.9The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
6.9%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
4.3%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
3.0%The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
2.8%The lower jaw is too short, reducing lower face strength and balance.
2.8%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.8%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.8%The eyes appear excessively round.
2.1%The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
1.5%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.6%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
0.5%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.4%8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.5%Jasmine Sanders's Harmony score is 7.0 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Jasmine Sanders is ranked 362nd of 659 women on the wiki.