Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


6.8
Great harmony
Top 9.2%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, John Harris scores 6.8, 498th of 1129 men on the wiki, in the top 45%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Upper Lip E-Line Position and Upper Lip S-Line Position, both at 0.1. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Erling Haaland (6.8), Kiernan Fagan (6.8) and Manu Rios (6.8). Alexander Zanoza has the highest, at 9.0.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.9This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.3This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
8.9This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
8.86 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.9The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
9.8%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
7.3%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
4.8%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
4.6%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
4.4%The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
4.2%The lower lip is too recessed, reducing fullness and profile balance.
3.0%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
2.2%The upper lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the lower lip.
2.2%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
1.6%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
0.9%The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
0.8%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
0.7%The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
0.5%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.3%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.2%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.2%3 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
2.8%John Harris's Harmony score is 6.8 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, John Harris is ranked 498th of 1129 men on the wiki, in the top 45%.