Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


4.8
Average harmony
Bottom 48%FaceIQ Labs rates Julard (Beatbox)'s Harmony at 4.8, 743rd of 874 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Ear Protrusion Ratio and Eyebrow Tilt, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Jaw Frontal Angle at 2.1 and Ipsilateral Alar Angle at 1.4. Dean Withers (4.8), RM (BTS) (4.8) and Trevor Lawrence (4.8) come closest to Julard's Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.49 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
6.7%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
6.2%The nose is too short vertically, creating a less balanced midface.
6.1%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
5.7%The eyes are too far apart, creating a wide or stretched midface appearance.
5.4%The middle of the face is too short, appearing compressed or wide.
4.4%The central midface is too wide, often due to wide-set eyes or a short nose.
3.6%The cheekbones are positioned too low, reducing midface prominence and youthfulness.
3.4%The nose protrudes excessively, dominating the facial profile.
3.3%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
3.2%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
2.9%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.5%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
2.4%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
2.4%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
2.4%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
2.3%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
2.3%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.3%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
1.9%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
1.1%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.0%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
0.8%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.8%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
0.7%The mouth corners are downturned, creating a frowning or sad appearance.
0.7%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.2%6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
4.4%Julard (Beatbox)'s Harmony score is 4.8 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Julard (Beatbox) is ranked 743rd of 874 men on the wiki.