Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


5.9
Good harmony
Top 33%FaceIQ Labs rates Kash Patel's Harmony at 5.9, 616th of 933 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Bitemporal Width and Ear Protrusion Ratio, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Upper Lip S-Line Position and Upper Lip E-Line Position, both at 1.3. Among the other celebrities, Bruce Lee (5.9), Jake Paul (5.9) and Paul Dano (5.9) sit closest. The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
8.79 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
5.5%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
3.8%The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
3.3%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
3.2%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
3.2%The nose protrudes excessively, dominating the facial profile.
3.1%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
3.0%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
2.9%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
2.5%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
2.5%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
2.4%The middle of the face is too short, appearing compressed or wide.
2.3%The lower lip is too recessed, reducing fullness and profile balance.
2.1%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
1.7%The upper lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the lower lip.
1.7%The jaw appears excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
1.6%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
1.4%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.4%The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
1.1%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
1.0%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
0.8%The eyes appear excessively round.
0.8%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
0.6%7 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.2%Kash Patel's Harmony score is 5.9 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Kash Patel is ranked 616th of 933 men on the wiki.