Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


5.8
Good harmony
Top 40%FaceIQ Labs rates Katerina Tannenbaum's Harmony at 5.8, 396th of 441 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Brow Length to Face Width Ratio, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Facial Convexity (Nasion) at 0.2 and Facial Convexity (Glabella) at 0.0. Among the other celebrities, Lee Wonhee (5.8), Rens Kroes (5.8) and Salma Hayek (5.7) sit closest. Sharam Diniz has the highest, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape; the top, middle, and Lower Thirds are neither too short nor too long.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
9.5This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
8.912 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.9The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
12.8%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
12.4%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
7.7%The nose lacks forward projection, appearing flat and less defined in the profile.
6.8%The nose appears too soft and weak, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
6.3%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
6.2%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
4.6%The nose droops downward, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
4.2%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
4.1%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.5%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.4%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
1.0%The nose bridge is excessively wide.
0.8%The eyebrows arch too high, creating an overly expressive or surprised look.
0.6%The nose tip is excessively pointed, creating a harsh appearance.
0.4%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
0.4%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.4%8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.7%Katerina Tannenbaum's Harmony score is 5.8 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Katerina Tannenbaum is ranked 396th of 441 women on the wiki.