Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


6.2
Very good harmony
Top 23%FaceIQ Labs rates Mark Dacascos' Harmony at 6.2, 570th of 945 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Submental Cervical Angle at 2.0 and Mouth width to nose width ratio at 1.4. Lucas Marchesi (6.2), Vmogsu (6.2) and Josip Broz Tito (6.2) come closest to Mark's Harmony score. David Rosenberg (Model) has the highest, at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.6This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.4This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
8.916 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.7The jaw has a softer, rounder shape, often less angular and robust than the ideal.
7.3%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
5.1%The nose appears too soft and weak, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
5.1%The outer corners of the eyes tilt upward excessively, creating an exaggerated look.
3.9%The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
3.8%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
3.7%The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
3.7%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
3.5%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
3.3%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.6%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.6%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
2.5%The lower face is too short, reducing chin and jaw prominence.
1.9%The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
1.7%The eyes appear excessively round.
1.7%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
1.4%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
1.1%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
0.9%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.5%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.4%6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
3.9%Mark Dacascos's Harmony score is 6.2 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Mark Dacascos is ranked 570th of 945 men on the wiki.