Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.2
Excellent harmony
Top 3.2%Mira Szalma's Harmony score is 7.2, 212th of 441 women on the wiki, in the top 49%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of her breakdown are Bitemporal Width and Ear Protrusion Ratio, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Upper Lip S-Line Position at 2.8 and Submental Cervical Angle at 0.4. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Ella Purnell (7.2), Kate Upton (7.2) and Alisha Boe (7.2). The highest on the wiki is Sharam Diniz, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.5This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.49 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.9The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
4.4%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
3.5%The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
2.9%The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
2.9%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.4%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.2%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
1.1%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
0.8%The forehead is too flat, lacking natural curvature and prominence.
0.7%The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
0.7%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.7%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.2%6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
3.4%Mira Szalma's Harmony score is 7.2 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Mira Szalma is ranked 212th of 441 women on the wiki, in the top 49%.