Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.7
Exceptional harmony
Top 1%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Nina Marker scores 7.7, 136th of 466 women on the wiki, in the top 30%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Anterior Facial Depth and Browridge Inclination Angle, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Nasofacial Angle at 3.9 and Top Third at 1.6. Tyla (7.7), Weronika Rosati (7.7) and Ana Paula Arosio (7.7) come closest to Nina's Harmony score. Sharam Diniz has the highest, at 9.2.
This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.9This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a proportionate facial structure; the lower face retains internal balance and harmony with the overall facial structure.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.4This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.27 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
10.0The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
3.0%The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
2.6%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
2.5%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
2.5%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
1.8%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.4%The nose bridge is excessively wide.
0.8%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.2%8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
7.1%Nina Marker's Harmony score is 7.7 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Nina Marker is ranked 136th of 466 women on the wiki, in the top 30%.