Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.1
Great harmony
Top 4.4%Rachel Weisz's Harmony score of 7.1 rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges, placing her 196th of 356 women on the wiki. The three closest scores belong to Angelina Jolie, Gigi Hadid and Meredith Duxbury, each also scoring 7.1. Her strongest measurements in this section are Rachel's Bigonial width score of 10.0 and Rachel's Bitemporal Width score of 10.0, while her weakest are Rachel's Upper Lip S-Line Position score of 1.7 and Rachel's Upper Lip E-Line Position score of 1.5. At the top of the range, Sharam Diniz holds the highest Harmony score on the wiki at 9.1.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.011 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
7.2%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
6.8%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
4.5%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
4.1%The brow ridge is overly prominent, creating a heavier and more robust appearance than the ideal.
2.5%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.1%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
2.1%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
2.0%The lower lip is too recessed, reducing fullness and profile balance.
1.8%The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
1.8%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
1.7%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
1.6%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
1.3%The upper lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the lower lip.
1.3%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
1.1%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
0.5%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.1%6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.2%Rachel Weisz's Harmony score is 7.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Rachel Weisz is ranked 201st of 364 women on the wiki.