Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.1
Great harmony
Top 4.5%FaceIQ Labs rates Scott Neslage (Model)'s Harmony at 7.1, 327th of 924 men on the wiki, in the top 36%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Cheekbone height, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Facial Convexity (Glabella) at 2.7 and Browridge Inclination Angle at 0.9. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Adam Cowie (Dante DMC 5) (7.1), Jin (BTS) (7.1) and Michael C Hall (7.1). David Rosenberg (Model) has the highest, at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape; the top, middle, and Lower Thirds are neither too short nor too long.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
9.414 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.7The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
5.3%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
5.3%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
5.0%The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
3.4%The nose protrudes excessively, dominating the facial profile.
3.2%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
2.6%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.4%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
1.0%The nose tip is excessively pointed, creating a harsh appearance.
0.9%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.9%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
0.7%11 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
11.3%Scott Neslage (Model)'s Harmony score is 7.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Scott Neslage (Model) is ranked 327th of 924 men on the wiki, in the top 36%.