Loading Harmony
Harmony
Ambra Bianchini
Harmony
5.2
Slightly above average harmony
Top 48%Side profile
Summary
In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Ambra Bianchini scores 5.2, 445th of 466 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Mouth width to nose width ratio at 0.7 and Ramus to Mandible Ratio at 0.1. Among the other celebrities, Jorja Smith (5.2), Caitlin Clark (5.3) and FKA twigs (5.3) sit closest. Sharam Diniz has the highest, at 9.2.
Strengths
- Ideal jaw width
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0 - Refined nasal tip
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0 - Ideal forehead width
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0 - Ideal upper forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0 - Balanced eyebrow tilt
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0 - Ideal eyebrow length
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0 - Ideal neck width
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0 - Ideal forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0 - Excellent eye size
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.9 - Excellent eye spacing
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.9 - Harmonious facial convexity
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.9 - Well-positioned lower lip
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.8 - Balanced lower lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8 - Well-contoured orbital region
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.8 - Well-positioned eyebrows
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.5 - Harmonious ear protrusion
This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.4 - Balanced eye shape
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.4 - Good midface projection
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.0 - Additional Strengths
12 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8
Areas for improvement
- Long midface
The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
8.3% - Long upper jaw
The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
7.9% - Disproportionate lower face (short chin or long philtrum)
The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
5.8% - Short lower jaw
The lower jaw is too short, reducing lower face strength and balance.
5.8% - Insufficient eye tilt
The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
5.1% - Maxillary recession
The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
4.5% - Round neck region
The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
3.5% - Weak/soft jaw structure
The jaw has a softer, rounder shape, often less angular and robust than the ideal.
3.1% - Overly long ramus
The vertical part of the jawbone is too long, elongating the lower face.
3.0% - Wide nose
The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.9% - Narrow mouth
The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.9% - Overly long face shape
The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
1.8% - Long lower third
The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
1.4% - Medium-set cheekbones
The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.3% - Disharmonious midface and jaw alignment
The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
0.9% - Overly narrow nose bridge
The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.4% - Lacking cupid's bow
The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.1% - Minor Proportional Variations
8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.4%
Similar harmony6
Share
Questions
What is Ambra Bianchini's Harmony score?
Ambra Bianchini's Harmony score is 5.2 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
How does Ambra Bianchini's Harmony compare with other celebrities?
By Harmony score, Ambra Bianchini is ranked 445th of 466 women on the wiki.