Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


8.0
Exceptional harmony
Top 0.4%Brett Hollands (Model)'s Harmony score is 8.0, 91st of 836 men on the wiki, in the top 11%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Anterior Facial Depth and Bigonial width, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Upper Lip E-Line Position at 1.1 and Upper Lip S-Line Position at 0.8. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Aleksa Gavrilovic (8.0), Apo Nattawin Wattanagitiphat (8.0) and Bill Skarsgård (8.0). David Rosenberg (Model) has the highest, at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a proportionate facial structure; the lower face retains internal balance and harmony with the overall facial structure.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
8.97 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.9%The lower lip is too recessed, reducing fullness and profile balance.
2.6%The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
2.6%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
2.0%The upper lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the lower lip.
2.0%The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
1.7%The forehead is excessively wide, creating a disproportionate upper face.
1.0%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
0.9%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.8%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.6%4 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
3.6%Brett Hollands (Model)'s Harmony score is 8.0 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Brett Hollands (Model) is ranked 91st of 836 men on the wiki, in the top 11%.