Loading ratio
Your Measurement
Loading ratio
Your Measurement

Your Measurement
2.02x
At 2.02x, Chris Colfer's Face Width to Height Ratio is above its ideal range of 1.96 to 2.00x and scores 9.7. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio evaluates midface compactness by comparing its width to height, influenced by brow position, philtrum length, and lip fullness. The value is higher than 90% of the men on the wiki, and 10% of them measure inside the ideal range. Andreas Erikson (2.02x), Erling Haaland (2.02x) and Isaac Moreno (2.02x) come closest to Chris' value. At either end, Jack Ma has the highest at 2.40x and Julian Richings the lowest at 1.47x. Of his other Face Shape measurements, Cheekbone height (85.8%) is the strongest at 10.0 and Total Facial Width to Height Ratio (1.22x) the weakest at 2.9. It counts toward his Harmony score.
Chris Colfer's Face Width to Height Ratio measures 2.02x, above its ideal range of 1.96 to 2.00x, for a score of 9.7.
At 2.02x, Chris Colfer's Face Width to Height Ratio is higher than 91% of the 613 other men on the wiki, and 11% of them measure inside the ideal range.