Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


6.6
Very good harmony
Top 14%FaceIQ Labs rates Ezra Miller's Harmony at 6.6, 452nd of 902 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Bitemporal Width and Brow Length to Face Width Ratio, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Deviation of IAA(Ipsilateral alar angle) & JFA(Jaw frontal angle) and Recession relative to frankfort plane, both at 2.3. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Cameron Hill (6.6), Mads Mikkelsen (6.6) and Robert Pattinson (6.6). The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.9This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.9This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.2This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
8.83 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
10.0The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
4.2%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.5%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
3.5%The forehead has a softer, less prominent ridge than the ideal.
3.0%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
2.8%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.5%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.4%The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
2.3%The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
2.0%The lower lip juts out excessively, unbalancing the lower face.
1.9%The lower lip is excessively thick, creating disproportionate lip proportions.
1.9%The eyebrows arch too high, creating an overly expressive or surprised look.
1.2%The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
0.7%The nose droops downward, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
0.5%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
0.3%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.3%The nose bridge is excessively wide.
0.3%4 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
3.0%Ezra Miller's Harmony score is 6.6 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Ezra Miller is ranked 452nd of 902 men on the wiki.