Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


6.2
Very good harmony
Top 23%Shubman Gill's Harmony score is 6.2, 544th of 904 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Bitemporal Width and Brow Length to Face Width Ratio, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Jaw Frontal Angle at 2.7 and Submental Cervical Angle at 2.0. Noah Centineo (6.2), Adin Ross (6.2) and Franco Noriega (6.2) come closest to Shubman's Harmony score. David Rosenberg (Model) has the highest, at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.3This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
8.87 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
6.1%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
3.7%The cheekbones are positioned too low, reducing midface prominence and youthfulness.
3.3%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.2%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
3.2%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
2.7%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
2.5%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
2.4%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.2%The midface is underprojected.
1.7%The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
1.4%The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
1.0%The forehead is too flat, lacking natural curvature and prominence.
0.9%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
0.6%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.5%5 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
3.3%Shubman Gill's Harmony score is 6.2 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Shubman Gill is ranked 544th of 904 men on the wiki.