Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


3.1
Poor harmony
Bottom 6.8%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Thomas Matthew Crooks scores 3.1, 876th of 910 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Bitemporal Width and Facial Depth to Height Ratio, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Lower Third Proportion at 1.0 and Deviation of IAA(Ipsilateral alar angle) & JFA(Jaw frontal angle) at 0.8. Rakai (3.1), D-Low (Beatbox) (3.1) and Matt Walsh (3.1) come closest to Thomas' Harmony score. David Rosenberg (Model) has the highest, at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
9.4This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.1This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
8.8This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
8.6This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
8.512 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.7The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
13.0%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
10.5%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
8.5%The eyes are too far apart, creating a wide or stretched midface appearance.
7.9%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
7.5%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
6.1%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
5.9%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
5.9%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
4.5%The middle of the face is too short, appearing compressed or wide.
4.2%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
4.0%The nose is too short vertically, creating a less balanced midface.
3.8%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
3.6%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
3.1%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
3.1%The central midface is too wide, often due to wide-set eyes or a short nose.
3.0%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.8%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.8%The eyes are too small, creating a less balanced facial appearance.
2.8%The forehead has a softer, less prominent ridge than the ideal.
2.8%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
2.2%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.8%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.8%The lower lip juts out excessively, unbalancing the lower face.
1.7%The lower lip is excessively thick, creating disproportionate lip proportions.
1.7%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
1.7%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
1.2%The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
1.2%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
1.2%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
0.4%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.2%6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.0%Thomas Matthew Crooks's Harmony score is 3.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Thomas Matthew Crooks is ranked 876th of 910 men on the wiki.