Loading ratio
Your Measurement
Facial Depth to Height Ratio
Your Measurement
1.34x
1.34x
-4.721.301.447.46
Summary
Thomas Matthew Crooks' Facial Depth to Height Ratio measures 1.34x, inside its ideal range of 1.30 to 1.44x, for a score of 10.0. The Facial Depth to Height Ratio evaluates forward facial growth by comparing facial depth (subnasale to tragus) to facial height (nasion to mentolabial fold). The value is higher than 55% of the men on the wiki, and 50% of them measure inside the ideal range. Among the other celebrities, Anthony Starr (1.34x), Ben Barnes (1.34x) and Broderick Hunter (1.34x) sit closest. At either end, Jack Doherty has the highest at 1.91x and John Turk the lowest at 0.41x. Of his other Facial Profile measurements, Anterior Facial Depth (62.0°) is the strongest at 9.4 and Facial Convexity (Nasion) (180.0°) the weakest at 1.1. It counts toward his Harmony score.
Similar Facial Depth to Height Ratio6
More in Facial Profile7
All ratios for Thomas Matthew Crooks66
Side profile
Share
Questions
What is Thomas Matthew Crooks's Facial Depth to Height Ratio?
Thomas Matthew Crooks's Facial Depth to Height Ratio measures 1.34x, inside its ideal range of 1.30 to 1.44x, for a score of 10.0.
How does Thomas Matthew Crooks's Facial Depth to Height Ratio compare with other celebrities?
At 1.34x, Thomas Matthew Crooks's Facial Depth to Height Ratio is higher than 53% of the 892 other men on the wiki, and 48% of them measure inside the ideal range.