Loading ratio
Your Measurement
Loading ratio
Your Measurement

Your Measurement
1.44x
At 1.44x, Thomas Matthew Crooks' Total Facial Width to Height Ratio is above its ideal range of 1.34 to 1.37x and scores 4.8. Total Facial Height-to-Width Ratio compares facial length to width, distinguishing long, short, or balanced shapes. The value is higher than 85% of the men on the wiki, and 25% of them measure inside the ideal range. Calvin Lee Vail (leafyishere) (1.44x), Chris Wood (1.44x) and Christian Bale (1.44x) come closest to Thomas' value. At either end, Ricky Berwick has the highest at 1.70x and Vincent Gallo the lowest at 0.70x. Of his other Face Shape measurements, Bitemporal Width (92.5%) is the strongest at 10.0 and Midface Ratio (1.14x) the weakest at 3.3. It counts toward his Harmony score.
Thomas Matthew Crooks's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio measures 1.44x, above its ideal range of 1.34 to 1.37x, for a score of 4.8.
At 1.44x, Thomas Matthew Crooks's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio is higher than 87% of the 901 other men on the wiki, and 25% of them measure inside the ideal range.