Loading Harmony
Harmony
David Midthunder
Harmony
6.0
Good harmony
Top 31%Side profile
Summary
In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, David Midthunder scores 6.0, 734th of 1129 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Browridge Inclination Angle and Cheekbone height, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Total Facial Width to Height Ratio at 1.5 and Submental Cervical Angle at 0.0. Charles Leclerc (6.0), Radu Dragusin (6.0) and Sunnery James (6.0) come closest to David's Harmony score. Alexander Zanoza has the highest, at 9.0.
Strengths
- Refined nasal tip
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0 - Ideal cupid's bow depth
This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0 - Well-positioned cheekbones
This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0 - Harmonious ear protrusion
This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
10.0 - Ideal forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0 - Balanced eye shape
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0 - Well-positioned eyebrows
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0 - Ideal eyebrow length
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0 - Harmonious facial convexity
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0 - Balanced brow ridge
This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.9 - Excellent maxillary projection
This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.8 - Balanced nose length
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.8 - Balanced midface length
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.8 - Excellent nose bridge width
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.7 - Excellent interior midface width
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.5 - Excellent jaw width
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.4 - Balanced eyebrow tilt
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.1 - Well-contoured orbital region
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
8.8 - Additional Strengths
13 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.5
Areas for improvement
- Overly compact face shape
The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
6.5% - Round neck region
The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
4.6% - Mandibular recession
The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.9% - Underprojected chin
The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
3.9% - Overly upturned eyes
The outer corners of the eyes tilt upward excessively, creating an exaggerated look.
3.4% - Steep jaw
The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
3.0% - Overly small eyes
The eyes are too small, creating a less balanced facial appearance.
2.7% - Overly protruded lower lip
The lower lip juts out excessively, unbalancing the lower face.
2.1% - Overly full lower lip
The lower lip is excessively thick, creating disproportionate lip proportions.
2.1% - Thin neck
The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
0.9% - Narrow forehead
The forehead is too slim relative to the face, reducing upper face balance.
0.9% - Overly sloped upper forehead
The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.5% - Disharmonious midface and jaw alignment
The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
0.5% - Long lower third
The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
0.5% - Minor Proportional Variations
9 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
7.7%
Similar harmony6
Share
Questions
What is David Midthunder's Harmony score?
David Midthunder's Harmony score is 6.0 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
How does David Midthunder's Harmony compare with other celebrities?
By Harmony score, David Midthunder is ranked 734th of 1129 men on the wiki.