Loading ratio
Your Measurement
Loading ratio
Your Measurement

Your Measurement
1.23x
At 1.23x, David Midthunder's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio is below its ideal range of 1.39 to 1.42x and scores 1.5. Total Facial Height-to-Width Ratio compares facial length to width, distinguishing long, short, or balanced shapes. The value is among the lowest of the men on the wiki, and 20% of them measure inside the ideal range. The closest values on the wiki belong to Clint Walker (1.23x), Daniel Larson (1.23x) and Harry Styles (1.23x). At either end, Michael Berryman has the highest at 1.80x and Juan Pedro Franco the lowest at 1.07x. Of his other Face Shape measurements, Cheekbone height (86.5%) is the strongest at 10.0 and Bitemporal Width (83.2%) the weakest at 6.2. It counts toward his Harmony score.
David Midthunder's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio measures 1.23x, below its ideal range of 1.39 to 1.42x, for a score of 1.5.
At 1.23x, David Midthunder's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio is higher than 2% of the 1132 other men on the wiki, and 18% of them measure inside the ideal range.