Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


6.5
Very good harmony
Top 15%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Drew Van Acker scores 6.5, 585th of 1133 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Anterior Facial Depth and Bigonial width, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Nasal Tip Angle at 1.6 and Browridge Inclination Angle at 0.3. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Matthew Perry (6.5), Rishabh Sawhney (6.5) and Bruno Vega (6.5). Alexander Zanoza has the highest, at 9.0.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious face shape; the top, middle, and Lower Thirds are neither too short nor too long.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
8.92 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.7The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
6.8%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
5.1%The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
5.1%The forehead has a softer, less prominent ridge than the ideal.
3.5%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
3.2%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
1.9%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.5%The nose tip is too round, lacking sharpness and definition.
1.3%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
1.2%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
0.7%The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
0.7%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.6%The nose bridge is excessively wide.
0.4%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.3%7 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.2%Drew Van Acker's Harmony score is 6.5 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Drew Van Acker is ranked 585th of 1133 men on the wiki.