Loading Harmony
Harmony
Emanuela Trane
Harmony
7.1
Great harmony
Top 4.3%Side profile
Summary
Emanuela Trane scores 7.1 for Harmony, a section that measures how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges, and she ranks 200th of 362 women on the wiki. Her strongest measurements in this section are Bigonial width and Bitemporal Width, both scoring 10.0, while her weakest are Lower Third at 3.5 and Chin to philtrum ratio at 3.6. Her score matches that of Rachel Weisz, Angelina Jolie and Anitta, the closest on the wiki, while the highest Harmony score belongs to Sharam Diniz at 9.1.
Strengths
- Ideal jaw width
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0 - Ideal forehead width
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0 - Balanced brow ridge
This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0 - Ideal forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0 - Well-positioned eyebrows
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0 - Balanced eyebrow tilt
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0 - Refined nasal tip
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0 - Ideal eyebrow length
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0 - Ideal interior midface width
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0 - Excellent eye tilt
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.9 - Well-positioned upper lip
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9 - Balanced upper lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9 - Well-projected nose
This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.9 - Balanced nasal profile
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.9 - Well-projected chin
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the chin sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.8 - Excellent mandibular projection
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating that the lower jaw is not recessed or overly projected.
9.8 - Balanced nose length
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.8 - Balanced midface length
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.8 - Excellent maxillary projection
This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.7 - Balanced lower lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.7 - Well-positioned lower lip
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.6 - Harmonious facial convexity
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.6 - Excellent ramus length
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.4 - Excellent cupid's bow depth
This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.3 - Harmonious ear protrusion
This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
8.9 - Well-contoured orbital region
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
8.8 - Balanced eye shape
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
8.8 - Additional Strengths
10 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6
Areas for improvement
- Overly compact face shape
The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
4.7% - Long upper jaw
The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
4.5% - Thin neck
The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
2.6% - Disproportionate lower face (short chin or long philtrum)
The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.5% - Overly harsh and prominent jaw
The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
2.0% - Disproportionate lower face (long chin or short philtrum)
The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.0% - Long lower third
The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.0% - Round neck region
The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
1.2% - Medium-set cheekbones
The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.1% - Disharmonious midface and jaw alignment
The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
0.9% - Overly narrow nose bridge
The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.5% - Minor Proportional Variations
8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
9.1%
Similar harmony6
Share
Questions
What is Emanuela Trane's Harmony score?
Emanuela Trane's Harmony score is 7.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
How does Emanuela Trane's Harmony compare with other celebrities?
By Harmony score, Emanuela Trane is ranked 200th of 366 women on the wiki.