Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


2.9
Poor harmony
Bottom 4%Erika Kirk's Harmony score is 2.9, 566th of 573 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of her breakdown are Bitemporal Width and Ear Protrusion Ratio, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Lower Third at 0.1 and Facial Convexity (Glabella) at 0.0. Cherry Babe (3.0), Marjorie Taylor Greene (2.3) and Secondo Tahva (Stefania Sperandio) (2.3) come closest to Erika's Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is Sharam Diniz, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
8.8This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
8.813 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.7The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
15.0%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
13.6%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
11.6%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
10.9%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
8.3%The nose appears too soft and weak, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
7.5%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
5.2%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
5.2%The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
5.0%The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
3.9%The brow ridge is overly prominent, creating a heavier and more robust appearance than the ideal.
3.6%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
3.4%The jaw appears excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
3.1%The nose droops downward, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
3.1%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
3.0%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
3.0%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
2.9%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
2.5%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.3%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.0%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.8%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
1.7%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
1.5%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
1.4%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
1.4%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.4%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.1%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.2%9 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
7.2%Erika Kirk's Harmony score is 2.9 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Erika Kirk is ranked 566th of 573 women on the wiki.