Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.1
Great harmony
Top 4.4%Harmony is the FaceIQ Labs section that rates how closely a face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges, and Eva Mendes scores 7.1 in it, ranking 205th of 378 women on the wiki. Her strongest measurements are Eva's Bigonial width score of 10.0 and her Bitemporal Width score of 10.0, while her weakest are her Eva's Nasofacial Angle score of 1.7 and her Eva's Facial Convexity (Nasion) score of 1.5. Her Harmony score matches that of Rachel Weisz and Angelina Jolie, both at 7.1, and also that of Emanuela Trane. At the top of the section sits Sharam Diniz with 9.1, the highest Harmony score on the wiki.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
9.8This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.15 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
11.3%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
9.5%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
5.2%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
3.9%The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
2.3%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
2.1%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.1%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.1%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
1.6%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
0.9%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
0.8%The eyebrows arch too high, creating an overly expressive or surprised look.
0.6%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
0.3%8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
6.2%Eva Mendes's Harmony score is 7.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Eva Mendes is ranked 205th of 378 women on the wiki.