Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


4.0
Below average harmony
Bottom 30%Giorgia Cardinaletti's Harmony score is 4.0, 423rd of 428 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Bitemporal Width and Ear Protrusion Ratio, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Submental Cervical Angle at 0.9 and Ramus to Mandible Ratio at 0.1. Among the other celebrities, Snooki (4.1), Naomi Osaka (4.2) and Rossy De Palma (3.9) sit closest. Sharam Diniz has the highest, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
10.0This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
8.913 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
8.2%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
5.3%The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
4.2%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
4.2%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
3.9%The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
3.9%The vertical part of the jawbone is too long, elongating the lower face.
3.0%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.0%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
3.0%The nose droops downward, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
3.0%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.3%The midface is underprojected.
2.3%The lower lip is too recessed, reducing fullness and profile balance.
1.7%The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
1.7%The face appears overly rounded, often due to excessive forward projection of the upper, middle, or lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an overbite or overjet.
1.7%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
1.6%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.4%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
1.3%The eyes appear excessively round.
1.1%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
0.9%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
0.8%The upper lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the lower lip.
0.7%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.5%7 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
4.3%Giorgia Cardinaletti's Harmony score is 4.0 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Giorgia Cardinaletti is ranked 423rd of 428 women on the wiki.