Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


8.0
Exceptional harmony
Top 0.4%India Eisley's Harmony score is 8.0, 98th of 556 women on the wiki, in the top 18%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Bitemporal Width and Chin to philtrum ratio, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Browridge Inclination Angle at 4.9 and Submental Cervical Angle at 1.2. Pooja Hegde (8.0), Camilla Cabello (8.0) and Elsa Hosk (8.0) come closest to India's Harmony score. Sharam Diniz has the highest, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a proportionate facial structure; the lower face retains internal balance and harmony with the overall facial structure.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the chin sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating that the lower jaw is not recessed or overly projected.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
9.7This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
8.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
8.55 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.9The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
4.0%The eyes are too far apart, creating a wide or stretched midface appearance.
2.7%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
1.2%The eyes appear excessively round.
1.1%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
0.8%The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
0.6%8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
6.8%India Eisley's Harmony score is 8.0 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, India Eisley is ranked 98th of 556 women on the wiki, in the top 18%.