Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


6.7
Great harmony
Top 10%FaceIQ Labs rates Jennie Kim's Harmony at 6.7, 373rd of 583 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Bitemporal Width and Brow Length to Face Width Ratio, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Recession relative to frankfort plane at 1.5 and Lower Third Proportion at 1.0. Emma Chamberlain (6.7), Lena Horne (6.7) and Pia Whitesell (6.7) come closest to Jennie's Harmony score. Ana paula arosio (prime) has the highest, at 9.1.
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
8.76 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.9The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.9%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
3.9%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
3.2%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
2.9%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.8%The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
2.8%The lower jaw is too short, reducing lower face strength and balance.
2.8%The outer corners of the eyes tilt upward excessively, creating an exaggerated look.
2.3%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.2%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.2%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
1.6%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
1.4%The eyes appear excessively round.
0.9%The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
0.9%The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
0.5%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
0.4%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.3%7 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.7%Jennie Kim's Harmony score is 6.7 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Jennie Kim is ranked 373rd of 583 women on the wiki.