Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


5.7
Good harmony
Top 41%FaceIQ Labs rates Mark Vanderloo's Harmony at 5.7, 717th of 1029 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Ear Protrusion Ratio and Eyebrow Tilt, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Gonial Angle at 2.8 and Submental Cervical Angle at 2.0. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Oscar Piastri (5.7), Aaron Paul (5.7) and Barron Trump (5.7). The highest on the wiki is Alexander Zanoza, at 9.0.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
8.9This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
8.810 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
8.2%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
5.1%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
3.7%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
2.8%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
2.2%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.0%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
2.0%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.0%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.0%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
1.9%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
1.9%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
1.5%The forehead is too slim relative to the face, reducing upper face balance.
0.9%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.9%The forehead is too flat, lacking natural curvature and prominence.
0.8%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.8%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.7%7 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.5%Mark Vanderloo's Harmony score is 5.7 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Mark Vanderloo is ranked 717th of 1029 men on the wiki.