Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


4.9
Average harmony
Bottom 49%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Paul Van Haver scores 4.9, 889th of 1061 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Anterior Facial Depth and Bitemporal Width, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Nose Tip Position at 1.2 and Lower Third at 0.5. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Adrien Brody (4.9), Dick Van Dyke (4.9) and Idris Elba (4.9). Alexander Zanoza has the highest, at 9.0.
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.4This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
8.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
8.59 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.7The jaw grows with an overly steep angle, resulting in a long or narrow lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an open bite or underbite.
10.3%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
6.0%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
6.0%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
6.0%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
6.0%The nose is overly upturned, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
3.3%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
3.0%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.9%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
2.9%The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
2.8%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
2.7%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
2.6%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.6%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
2.2%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
2.2%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
1.9%The midface is underprojected.
1.7%The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
1.3%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.1%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
0.8%8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
7.4%Paul Van Haver's Harmony score is 4.9 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Paul Van Haver is ranked 889th of 1061 men on the wiki.